<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>SOPREMA Forums - Open Discussion - Competing with trilaminated base sheets - Messages</title>
<link>https://forum.sopraconnect.com/topic12-competing-with-trilaminated-base-sheets.aspx</link>
<description>SOPREMA Forums - Open Discussion - Competing with trilaminated base sheets - Messages</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<generator>Jitbit AspNetForum</generator>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 16:57:04 GMT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 16:57:04 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<link>https://forum.sopraconnect.com/topic12-competing-with-trilaminated-base-sheets.aspx</link>
<title>Message from Roofing Concepts</title>
<description><![CDATA[Greg, Ive had some success by sitting down with the designer to discuss the Tri-laminate sheet- explaining that its a proprietary sheet that was designed for the Garlands and Tremcos to market a "special sheet".  Once you look at the MD/XD physical properties you will find our sheets are too far off. I seen this was a question from May so not sure how you made out on that.]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 16:57:04 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>https://forum.sopraconnect.com/topic12-competing-with-trilaminated-base-sheets.aspx</link>
<title>Message from gputney@soprema.us</title>
<description><![CDATA[Has anybody had success with a SOPREMA system that competes when a trilaminated base ply is included in a base specification ?]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2017 14:19:19 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
